Jump to content


Rpgm 2000 Or 2003?


  • You cannot reply to this topic
4 replies to this topic

Poll: 2000 or 2003?

Which one do you like best?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Nick

Nick

    Tech-Support Guru

  • Admin
  • 5951 posts

Posted 02 March 2009 - 10:42 PM

I definitely recommend RPGM 2003. It has a better graphics set, more scripts to use, easier interface, new battle engine, and the runtime package is automatically included with packaged (finished) games. It makes creating games (like Liberta) fun and easy. So you can function on creating the overall story and not the scripts & code. ^_^

Which one do you prefer?
Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

#2 CunnyFunt

CunnyFunt

    N00b-a-R00b

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 15 posts

Posted 08 October 2009 - 01:50 AM

What about XP and VX? I personally find RPG Maker XP to be the best, VX sucks so hard.
The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.

If a person is legally blind, but can suddenly see... Is he breaking the law?

#3 Nick

Nick

    Tech-Support Guru

  • Admin
  • 5951 posts

Posted 08 October 2009 - 04:47 AM

2003 is much easier and more fun to work with, rather than XP.
Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

#4 CunnyFunt

CunnyFunt

    N00b-a-R00b

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 15 posts

Posted 08 October 2009 - 07:27 AM

If you take the time to learn the ruby scripting engine it becomes even more easier than 2003 imo. 2003 is still fun though.
The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.

If a person is legally blind, but can suddenly see... Is he breaking the law?

#5 Nick

Nick

    Tech-Support Guru

  • Admin
  • 5951 posts

Posted 08 October 2009 - 04:50 PM

My day's of game programming are pretty much over. The only two 'completed' games I made, were Liberta & Underworld Apprentice.
Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image





Skin Designed By Evanescence at IBSkin.com