Jump to content


Replying to Scummvm


Post Options

  or Cancel


Topic Summary

MdaG

Posted 19 June 2005 - 06:33 AM

Ah ok, getting in touch with the maker is an important thing. I guess I've missed that part. Well it explains a few things ;-)

Kosta

Posted 18 June 2005 - 09:44 PM

Someone needs to write a review for it, get in contact with the makers and so on... :)

And for now we're busy with games, but we'll get on Scumm ASAP!

MdaG

Posted 18 June 2005 - 08:34 PM

Is there any trouble adding ScummVM to the site? Not that I really need it to be here, but I'm kind of curious...

DeathDude

Posted 05 June 2005 - 06:48 PM

Indeed I agree with that, scummvm does a really nice job with those 2 games, but if it works in dosbox, so much the better.

MdaG

Posted 05 June 2005 - 06:19 PM

taikara, on Jun 5 2005, 05:08 PM, said:

I'm not sure about Beneath a Steel Sky, but FOTAQ runs on DOSBox just fine  :)

But, yes, good idea.
Yeah, but generally in my experience they run better in ScummVM.

taikara

Posted 05 June 2005 - 05:08 PM

I'm not sure about Beneath a Steel Sky, but FOTAQ runs on DOSBox just fine  :)

But, yes, good idea.

Kon-Tiki

Posted 05 June 2005 - 12:33 PM

Nagi and Sarien too then :)

Kosta

Posted 05 June 2005 - 11:11 AM

Agreed! :)
We'll start working on it ASAP

Flop

Posted 05 June 2005 - 09:36 AM

Yeah, good point. ScummVM should be on here.

kOS

Posted 05 June 2005 - 09:30 AM

hah! good point! :) ;)

Review the complete topic (launches new window)