Replying to Article On Wikipedia For Reloaded
Topic Summary
wood
Posted 09 September 2006 - 05:36 PM
Nice! Congratulations to all involved in such a positive outcome.
Never felt so good to be so wrong...
Never felt so good to be so wrong...
A. J. Raffles
Posted 09 September 2006 - 04:19 PM
No, I'm sorry. I should have made myself clearer.
Abi79
Posted 09 September 2006 - 11:58 AM
She meant that AB is notable even by Wikipedia's ridiculous criteria.
A. J. Raffles
Posted 09 September 2006 - 09:26 AM
A. J. Raffles
Posted 09 September 2006 - 09:08 AM
Well, there's no doubt about AB being notable even by their ridiculous criteria.
Romano
Posted 09 September 2006 - 09:02 AM
Congratulations
It was very hard to gain keep decission so the final success is even greater then for Abandonia.
Keep good work
It was very hard to gain keep decission so the final success is even greater then for Abandonia.
Keep good work
Moogle
Posted 09 September 2006 - 06:37 AM
A. J. Raffles, on Sep 9 2006, 05:59 AM, said:
Moogle, on Sep 9 2006, 01:56 AM, said:
Long read =\
I suppose this is good news, but it can still be merged with the AB article, right? If that happens, will the entire article be moved or will everything need to be squeezed into two short paragraphs?